Thursday, 14 October 2010

Citizen Candidate Carl Paladino face politically correct crucible. What about his constitutional rights?


The Last Tradition is a very small and insignificant blog. I don’t carry any weight at all. But, let me speak in favor of Carl Paladino.

How often have you watched a politician, any politician no matter the party and wished they would just answer questions in a straight manner?

Why couldn’t they say what they mean and mean what they say?

Carl Paladino said he wasn’t politically correct and I thought that such a declaration was a breath of fresh air.

Then he said he didn’t want kids brain-washed into thinking that Homosexuality was an acceptable way of life.

I agreed with his comments and millions of New Yonkers do too. However, Paladino is being excoriated by the media for being exactly what he said he was-politically incorrect.

Being politically correct means that you’re not allowed to believe and say what Christianity, Islam and Judaism teaches-that homosexuality is immoral.

Being politically correct means that a person’s 1st amendment right to practice a religion is rendered null and void because it conflicts with the sensibilities of other peoples (a much smaller minority) who practice little or no religion at all.

Being politically correct means constitutional rights can be cherry picked in favor of protected groups that will always demand more and more rights for themselves at the expense of others.

Being politically correct has us all living a cultural apartheid where it becomes impossible for anyone to say what they mean and mean what they say, and Carl Paladino is learning that lesson the most.

New York in the long run will be the worse for it with another tax and spend Democrat in the state house.

But, at least Andrew Cuomo is politically correct, right? That matters more than anything.

I tried to help you, Carl!

Memeorandum


Tell two friends about this blog